In response to:

Cads for Choice!

It always does include that Right to abstain. OTOH, it never has and it never will include any such thing as your right to make her abstain.
Anominus Wrote: Feb 05, 2013 2:10 PM
How you "see it" is irrelevent because your view (essentially closing your eyes to any facts you disagree with) is inconsistent with the facts.
FlamingLiberalMultiCulturalist Wrote: Feb 05, 2013 1:34 PM
I do not support the right of a woman to commit murder, but I do not see Abortion as Murder if it occurs soon enough in the pregnancy.
Anominus Wrote: Feb 05, 2013 1:27 PM
Actually, FLMC, you *do* support a woman's "right" to discard the natural consequences of her actions, regardless of the cost to others.
FlamingLiberalMultiCulturalist Wrote: Feb 05, 2013 1:25 PM
I do not object to having people deal with the consequences of their choices. The difficult issue is the extent to which anyone else is allowed to inflict consequences.
DCM in FL Wrote: Feb 05, 2013 12:13 PM
There is no right to make anyone else abstain. But there also is no right to indulge without having the consequences of indulging. That's a nonexistent right that abortion attempts to make exist.

At least Toure is honest.

On the 40th anniversary of Roe vs. Wade, the MSNBC commentator literally thanked God and country for abortion. Fifteen years ago, he was in a “committed relationship” with a woman “who I knew was just not the one.” As Toure explained:

“She got pregnant, and I was terrified…I knew that pregnant woman and I were not going to be able to form a lasting family. She decided it was best to have an abortion and days later she did, we did, and in some ways that choice saved my life. I remain committed to being pro-choice...