In response to:

Cads for Choice!

And I have no doubt that the Women's Liberation movement was & is a scheme fostered upon the American Public by Huge Multinational Corporations in order to conceal the effects of working- and middle-class wage stagnation since the 1970s by making two-income families the new normal in the USA, thus at least temporarily preserving the illusion of upward mobility. See? I can cling to a partisan political distortion of reality with jst a much fealty asyou!
TheBarbarian Wrote: Feb 05, 2013 11:18 AM
And this is about as on topic as....
FlamingLiberalMultiCulturalist Wrote: Feb 05, 2013 11:18 AM
All people's wages have stagnated since the late 1970s, not women's vs men's, indeed lost money in real buying power terms. The point is that the growth in two-wage-earner households concealed this for a long time.
Basset Hound Wrote: Feb 04, 2013 3:42 PM
"Wage stagnation" due to the fact that men and women make different job and career choices. If you examine the wages of women who have NOT interrupted their careers to raise families, the salaries are essentially the same.

At least Toure is honest.

On the 40th anniversary of Roe vs. Wade, the MSNBC commentator literally thanked God and country for abortion. Fifteen years ago, he was in a “committed relationship” with a woman “who I knew was just not the one.” As Toure explained:

“She got pregnant, and I was terrified…I knew that pregnant woman and I were not going to be able to form a lasting family. She decided it was best to have an abortion and days later she did, we did, and in some ways that choice saved my life. I remain committed to being pro-choice...