In response to:

Tax Rich Liberals

fdroese Wrote: Dec 13, 2012 8:55 AM
A flat rate would be fair. 10% of a million is a hell of a lot more than 10% of 50 thousand. Now that would be fair share.
Roberty Wrote: Dec 13, 2012 10:38 AM
Don't misunderstand, Scrap, I really want the FairTax but don't think that it would fly at this time. What I am advocating is cutting through all of the irrelevant rhetoric and exposing the real issues to the light in a diferent way so as to push the discussion towords true reform and make the Dems explain why we must maintain a 70,000 page tax code to protect the "pitiful, unforunate poor."
Scrap Iron in Texas Wrote: Dec 13, 2012 9:22 AM
But why do you insist on taxing income?
Why is taxing income a better way to fund thee federal government tan a tax on consumption?

Learn about the Fair Tax (HR 25).
Once you understand it, you'll DEMAND it.

Republicans have been forced into a Hobson's choice of either letting the Bush tax cuts expire for everyone or agreeing to a tax hike on the top 2 percent of income earners (not to be confused with "the rich," who have already made, inherited or married their money).

If Republicans object to the Democrats' hitting job creators with a tax hike, three things will happen: Taxes will go up for everyone; Republicans will be seen as the "party of the rich"; and the inevitable economic collapse will be blamed on Republicans.

If Democrats were merely trying to raise...

Tuesday, May 21 | 12:07 PM ET
Tuesday, May 21 | 12:07 PM ET
Tuesday, May 21 | 12:07 PM ET
Tuesday, May 21 | 12:07 PM ET