1 - 5
In response to:

The American Dream or Nightmare?

fbeswick Wrote: Apr 02, 2013 10:17 AM
Mr Yousssef, they are not 'abortion pills'. Please get your facts right. The morning after pill is not an abortion pill. It is a myth that it prevents fertilised egg from implantation. In fact, it is just a spermicide: it thickens the vaginal mucus so the sperm has much less chance to fertilise the egg. You are just plain wrong. Nobody is being required to pay for abortions for their workers.
In response to:

Obama's War on Women

fbeswick Wrote: Aug 15, 2012 12:13 PM
Or how about men do it. See how they like it. Of course, some men would like it very much. What men dont seem to get, is feminism allows men to be themselves: macho, or gentle, according to type. Do u know, the reason the cadets of the Citadel didnt want girls in is its the only place they dont have to be macho, they can just be human, They can make beds, sew and gossip, be afraid, cry, tell another man u love him w/out being called gay. Feminism would let men drop the pretences, just be themselves. We could all be ourselves. I was happiest when I made the $ and boyfriend made dinner.
In response to:

Obama's War on Women

fbeswick Wrote: Aug 15, 2012 12:00 PM
Nonsense. Having a professional career is much more demanding. Feed a kid properly, get them in a good school, try and help their little problems, when they're in school, they are already leaving you. This isn't rocket science. It's not brain surgery. How can you compare cleaning floors and picking up clothes and all those endless mindless jobs to a career. It's just reproduction, any animal can do it. Stuff about a great honour is like the cynical manipulation 50s advertisers used to do: convincing women they needed special stuff to clean floors, windows, etc, to make them feel it was a demanding profession. Actually, housekeeping is well suited to mentally retarded ppl: they find it challenging.
In response to:

Obama's War on Women

fbeswick Wrote: Aug 15, 2012 11:55 AM
The working women will then be able to hire help, creating more jobs, a professional class of housekeepers and child-reares. This is what Hong Kong women do and it makes them better mothers. They are fulfilled in their work, and not stressed by child-rearing: so they are happy mothers who give the best to their kids, instead of snappy, weepy irritable woman who feels her life is going by while very unfairly her husband gets to work and have family life too. I do think women should have a choice, but feminists mean that while women feel they can just run home if they don't like work, they will never grow up. Men don't choose a wife cos she can pay for his life. Men take responsibility, women must too.
In response to:

Obama's War on Women

fbeswick Wrote: Aug 15, 2012 11:49 AM
For God's sake, Obama inherited all this mess, along with two ruinous wars. Within only two years, Republicans were screaming he hadn't cleared up their mess. They keep saying he's doing nothing, but their solution is do more of nothing! They want to take money from the poorest and give it to the richest: this is socialism for the rich. Let's try the other way round. Take some of the trillions, literally, they hid: invest in infrastructure, create jobs, ppl can spend their wages on useful stuff like cars, furniture, not hookers and coke, creating more wealth. Develop clean environment, more jobs. But oh no, that would be socialism! When its for the ordinary man, oh that's bad. Give money to the rich, that's good. This is stupid.
1 - 5