In response to:

The Fallacy of Redistribution

fbear163 Wrote: Sep 20, 2012 12:29 PM
My point, is that the re-distribution of wealth isn't achieved just through taxes. It is achieved by curbing the control that larger corporations have. An example is controlling monopolies. There are a multitude of policies which have and haven't worked to try and re-distribute wealth. Controlling monopolies is just a good example. It's is of course inevitable that monopoly controls can be steered by gov to favour certain corps. Which actually supports my point rather than weakening it. I will confess I am slightly off topic on this one but I'm trying to say re-distribution isn't as simple as taxing the rich and giving to the poor.
The recently discovered tape on which Barack Obama said back in 1998 that he believes in redistribution is not really news. He said the same thing to Joe the Plumber four years ago. But the surfacing of this tape may serve a useful purpose if it gets people to thinking about what the consequences of redistribution are.

Those who talk glibly about redistribution often act as if people are just inert objects that can be placed here and there, like pieces on a chess board, to carry out some grand design. But if human beings have their own responses to government policies,...