In response to:

Missouri Dems: Let’s Just Force Gun Owners to Surrender, Destroy Their Weapons

fawnsdan Wrote: Feb 18, 2013 10:58 PM
Its Four State Reps from the St Louis area. As the article stated, it will not pass. Just some knuckle-heads trying to drum up support from Obama. Missouri is a conservative state over all as you may remember it went to Romney in 12, unfortunately some did vote for McCaskill.
Luscious Lars Wrote: Feb 19, 2013 9:17 AM
I figured that it was some lunatics from either St. Louis or Kansas City, MO. Constitution stomping progressives always seem to hang out in the big cities, even if those cities are in more conservative states. Missouri is a prime example. So is Minnesota. If you plucked out Minneapolis, St. Paul, and Duluth, Minnesota would be a red state. But we suffer under the liberal boot of spending and taxation. Oddly enough, we've had some republican governors, but we have a real looney tunes liberal right now, in Mark Dayton, of the "Dayton" family who owned the Dayton's/Target empire. Dayton's is now Macy's. Little Markist Markey was never involved in the family business, however. He's been playing politics most of his adult life.

Why wait for the supply to dry up over time when you could just force gun owners to surrender or destroy their weapons immediately? Missouri Democrats think it’s a good idea:

Democrats in the state House have proposed a bill that would force gun owners to either surrender or destroy weapons including semi-automatic rifles with detachable magazines and semi-automatic pistols with a fixed magazine that can shoot more than 10 rounds before being reloaded.

Ammunition-feeding devices that can hold more than 10 rounds also would be banned. Owners also could send their weapons to another...