In response to:

The Atheist Response to Sandy Hook

Farmer5 Wrote: Jan 15, 2013 12:09 PM
Prager was only saying what an atheist would need to say to be consistent with their world view. Lack of internal consistency between claimed belief and what atheists would actually say by way of consolation was his point. Prager was not suggesting atheists must say his last paragraph just that it accurately sums up the atheistic world view and leaves them with nothing useful to say to the grieving. Well, I suppose they could say “I feel your pain” for what that is worth.
Last week the New York Times published an opinion piece that offered atheism's response to the evil/tragedy in which 20 children and six adults were murdered at the Sandy Hook elementary school in Connecticut.

What prompted Susan Jacoby to write her piece was a colleague telling her that atheism "has nothing to offer when people are suffering."

She wrote the piece, "The Blessings of Atheism" ("It is Here and It is Now!" screams the subhead) to prove her colleague wrong by offering a consoling atheist alternative to religion's consoling belief in an afterlife. Atheists cannot believe that there is any...

Related Tags: Guns Atheists Sandy Hook