1 - 10 Next
In response to:

ACLU Attacks God and Children, Again

excom1 Wrote: Jun 27, 2011 1:02 PM
truly a new reader of Alinsky's 'rules for radicals'. A concise, brief self descripyion of a toad.
In response to:

ACLU Attacks God and Children, Again

excom1 Wrote: Jun 27, 2011 12:44 PM
a good point. Save some meney and let the president and congress know you don't was any more money spend on the unnecessary, and ill considered military expenses involved in the Libya and Yemen ventures now
In response to:

ACLU Attacks God and Children, Again

excom1 Wrote: Jun 27, 2011 12:38 PM
keep the 'rules for radicals' out of your posts and perhaps you could be a part of meaningful discussion.
In response to:

ACLU Attacks God and Children, Again

excom1 Wrote: Jun 27, 2011 12:35 PM
Jefferson's letter was not really meant as a letter of assurance. The letter was a reminder that the 'inaleinable rights' of ciitizens covered the free practice of religious choice as opposed to the 'grant of favor' mentioned in the Danbury letter to Jefferson" 'In summary, there is no evidence that the context of the Danbury letter was a rumor of a national establishment. On the contrary, the concern of the Danbury Baptists was religious oppression in the state of Connecticut. Jefferson used the letter as an opportunity to express his own views that the First Amendment created a "wall of separation between church and state." This was no mere assurance that Congress could not establish a national religion. It was a response to the...
In response to:

ACLU Attacks God and Children, Again

excom1 Wrote: Jun 27, 2011 12:14 PM
Black did not agree.
In response to:

ACLU Attacks God and Children, Again

excom1 Wrote: Jun 27, 2011 12:10 PM
Jefferson's letter to the Danbury church was plainly directed to the fact that the federal government would not select and prefer any one religion or belief to be the official religion or belief in the new country nor would the federal government ever interfere the free choice of worship and belief of any faith or lack of faith. Since FDR, all presidents have made, when SCOTUS openings permitted, appointments of persons who reflected the prevailing party's agenda. The current president has made, so far, two appointments to the SCOTUS that reinforce the deliberate corruption of the "wall of separation" mentioned only in Jefferson's letter THE TWO LINKS BELOW CONCERN THIS MATTER: lst link is the Danbury Church letter to...
In response to:

Awesome: Rant of the Year?

excom1 Wrote: Jun 24, 2011 6:43 AM
Behold!! The wrath of an unrighteous troll, stirred out of it's slime by the clarion call of truth.
In response to:

Obama's Gangster Government

excom1 Wrote: May 22, 2011 9:36 PM
Obama just appointed former union boss Andy Stern, an avowed marxist, to the National Labor Relations Board. Another payment to the unions that beefs up their attack on Boeing and the business of America in general. Another move to "fundamentally change this nation".
.since march6, Obama and his puppets; clinton, gates, schummer, carney etal, have been saying..'Gaddafi has got to go'.. Now, after his illegal war in Libya, fulfilling 'a legal obligation of the UN member states, has failed to effect Gaddafi, Germany withdrew and Turkey, Qatar, UAE, and other European nations have refused to bomb Libya, the 'mission' has been turned over to NATO [An organization of 28 north Atlantic countries,) none of which has been attacked or threatened by Libya Dems and Reps have criticized Obama for his violation War Powers Act. Now Friday 3/25, Obama said "we are not seeking to topple Gaddafi from power, but are engaged in a limited effort to protect civilians.. Monday 3/28/11, at 7::30pm, Obama will spin...
Another attempt to be relevant with no realization of the absurdity of this proposed spending. John Kerry: In my opinion you are a traitor:; meeting with an emissary of our enemy, in France, while you were a US Navy officer. In my opinion you lied about your combat service and the 'wounds' you received. You promised you would permit the opening of your US Navy military service record. You have not done so. You still lie. You are without honor!! I am in my eighties now and look back on all of my life's works, accomplishments, mistakes, my Honorable service in the Regular U.S. Army, my 33 years of faithful police service in a large eastern city, during which I earned command status, my devotion to my wife and children and most...
1 - 10 Next