In response to:

This Is Still a Terrible Economy and Obama's Responsible for It

evan43 Wrote: Sep 19, 2012 6:29 PM
You need 2/3 to repeal a law, correct? Not seeing either side get this. Taxes - Assume I make $100,000. In which year do I pay the LEAST taxes (income, SS, health)? 1955 (Eisenhower), 1972 (Nixon), 1984 (Reagan), or Obama 2012? Answer - you'll pay less today, brother. But you are correct. Being socialist is about spending as much as it's about taxes. But I have to ask, in which year did we become 'socialist' according to the graph? Can you pinpoint it? I can't. http://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/2012/06/Federal_Spending_Bush_Vs_Obama.png

WASHINGTON- Somewhere in the last month or so, Mitt Romney's presidential campaign lost its laser-like focus on the bleak, job- starved Obama economy.

It allowed Obama's campaign to define him with a blitz of television ads in the summer, as Romney husbanded his resources and declined to aggressively punch back in the key battleground states that will decide the outcome of this election.

That allowed Barack Obama's shell game campaign of deception and distraction to move into the lead on some of Romney's bread-and-butter issues, including a slight edge on handling the economy, according to one poll.

...
Wednesday, June 19 | 07:52 AM ET
Wednesday, June 19 | 07:52 AM ET
Wednesday, June 19 | 07:52 AM ET
Wednesday, June 19 | 07:52 AM ET