In response to:

Google At Odds With President Obama

PecosPete.38 Wrote: Apr 18, 2012 9:12 PM
Interesting question, Ms Kelly. However, I am really glad they can make generics cause they're so much cheaper. People still buy the expensive original if they prefer it. It prob'ly has to do with how outrageiously high pharma is, and how the gov't has to pay for so much of it. both in upfront research money & buying it for those on gov't assistance. If you want to know a really interesting spy book on the subject of pharma, read "The Constant Gardener," by John Le Carre. They made a movie of it also.
Ms Kelly Wrote: Apr 18, 2012 10:48 PM
You may be right about patent vs. copyright, but I’m pretty sure both are considered intellectual property. If there is one standard for the arts and another standard for developing a product, that is just wrong in my opinion. There should be equality under the law.

You know it is always the artists, writers, actors and recording artists who get the privileges because they are the most vocal. They are also the liberals where product developers are usually conservative, and conservatives are notorious for not standing up for themselves.
Ms Kelly Wrote: Apr 18, 2012 10:44 PM
By Mo, do you mean Does Mohammad? I haven’t seen her on here for almost a year. I wish she would come back. I didn’t agree with her on some things, but the conversations were always lively, and she always had great input.

Roy323 Wrote: Apr 18, 2012 9:56 PM
I don't profess to know anything about "the Law", but I suspect the difference(s) may be found in the definitions of a "PATENT" (which defines Drugs, I think) and a "Copyright" in the case of Print, Film, etc. I may not be even close on this--Ask MO! SHE does, in fact KNOW most things of that nature!
Roy323 Wrote: Apr 18, 2012 9:56 PM
I don't profess to know anything about "the Law", but I suspect the difference(s) may be found in the definitions of a "PATENT" (which defines Drugs, I think) and a "Copyright" in the case of Print, Film, etc. I may not be even close on this--Ask MO! SHE does, in fact KNOW most things of that nature!

The President and Google co-Founder Sergey Brin are at odds. While Brin argues that unnecessary regulations inhibit entrepreneurship and innovation, Obama takes the position that government - and regulatory schemes - makes entrepreneurship and innovation possible.

Brin recently explained to The Guardian how government interference, and the dominance of Apple and Facebook make it extremely difficult to innovate in today's Internet environment: (emphasis mine)

The threat to the freedom of the internet comes, he claims, from a combination of governments increasingly trying to control access and communication by their citizens, the entertainment industry's attempts to crack down on piracy, and...
Thursday, May 23 | 03:56 PM ET
Thursday, May 23 | 03:56 PM ET
Thursday, May 23 | 03:56 PM ET
Thursday, May 23 | 03:56 PM ET