to be had by us if we can get past the anger. #6. Ron Paul is not an isolationist, he is a non-interventionist. Big difference. If America would mind it's business and not try to nation-build around the world, we wouldn't have a foreign relations problem. We certainly are NOT to blame for 9/11 but our policies of interference to go a long way to sully our reputation among other countries. #7. Yes, get the he** out of Irag and Afghanistan. We didn't belong there either! #8. Almost the same as #6 in that if we adopted a hands-off policy on sticking our nose in other countries business they wouldn't try to kill us. Drones that bomb targets in Pakistan? Really? If someone did that to the US, we'd consider it an act of war.

#2 - The 'conspiracy' about the NAU is real, not fiction. The fact that Bush met with the leaders of Canada and Mexico, and Obama continues to meet with them to discuss it is proof. #3. 'Truther conspiracy nuts'? Isn't the truth a desirable thing? Would we rather hear a believable story or the truth? I would hope that seeking truth, on any subject, would be the desire of all Americans. If there's more to know about the attacks on 911 or the birth certificate or the Fast and Furious scandal then don't we deserve the whole truth? #5. I think his supporters, myself included, are so incredibly angry with both mainline parties that when we do get a chance to speak, it's the anger and frustration that comes out first. There is substantive debate