In response to:
Ransom,
WTH are you raving about? I made a brief comment that George Romney was a good man whose moderate political stands would not be welcome today in the party he once championed. I DID NOT mention his son or their relationship. I DID NOT say that G. Romney would "be running to the Democrats" (he'd more likely do what I've done and abandon both major parties). I DID NOT lecture you or anyone else about ANYTHING. I did not even mention you, let alone your family or your relationships therein.
So, what is the deal with you putting fantastical words into other people's mouths and then rebutting that which they never even hinted at, let alone said? ......
Anderson659 wrote: Obama is not an idiot, far from it, he has a vision for America that is defined by radical left progressive social marxism, trickle down economics from the government. The Democrat party us now a party of secular humanist radicals. -Idiots Offer Hope, Change, Blame, Revenge- and Self Government
Dear Brother Anderson,
The Democrat Party has been a bunch of secular humanists for quite some time. This isn’t Harry Truman’s Democrat Party, although I’ll admit that Truman’s economic policies were really bad.
I disagree with your evaluation of Obama however.
First of all, he’s dedicated his whole...
Only the brain-dead vote straight party tickets.
And you still need to employ an editor to save you from posting stuff like "You're problem is" instead of "Your problem is". Or, "a doctor who specializes dry eyes". Find help. And perhaps a soothing cup of chamomile tea.
You sound as confused as Ransom.
My original comment was 58 words long. I call that brief.
Ransom spent a good many more words than that misrepresenting what I said.