In response to:

Al Gore Warming

erasmussen Wrote: Jan 19, 2013 2:24 PM
That's untrue, Bayesian statistics are different but that doesn't permit them to violate statistical methodology. Perhaps, actually, it's more stringent with regard to statistical methodology

In October one of the main culprits in the global warming hoax published new data that undermines their own theory of global warming. The UK’s MET Office, more formally called the UK's National Weather Service, updated global temperatures for 2012 and the new dataset shows that an “unlikely” event has occurred, according to their own models: Global warming has been halted for 15 years and counting.

While the MET Office accused critics of cherry-picking a starting point and nitpicked about language-for example the Daily Mail reported that the “Met Office report [was] quietly released,” while the Met office whined they just...

Friday, May 24 | 03:10 AM ET
Friday, May 24 | 03:10 AM ET
Friday, May 24 | 03:10 AM ET
Friday, May 24 | 03:10 AM ET