In response to:

Al Gore Warming

erasmussen Wrote: Jan 19, 2013 2:23 PM
Another item is that statistical means are to be representative of something, an underlying distribution. To so represent the earth the sites must meet very tight standards not just scattered around the earth for weather forecasting at some population center and for bureaucratic whim. Plus they must be accurate, an absence of flawed data. Plus what's the distribution mean. A mean for everything form the poles to the equator isn't one distribution, it's just the sum of a bunch of scattered nos. Perhaps the greatest mistake regarding climate change (global warming) is the abuse of data both in methodology and in interpretation.
rmccarthy Wrote: Jan 19, 2013 9:00 PM
Do you live in Italy and are concerned with another invasion?
Mother of 4 -- the original Wrote: Jan 19, 2013 4:40 PM
I'll think about maybe worrying some day after the glaciers that now block the passes across the Alps that Hannibal used melt.
rmccarthy Wrote: Jan 19, 2013 2:37 PM
I see it as: Greenland was frozen, then it wasn't and the Vikings came. Then it froze and the Vikings left or died. Now, it is melting and HERE COME THE VIKINGS, AGAIN!

In October one of the main culprits in the global warming hoax published new data that undermines their own theory of global warming. The UK’s MET Office, more formally called the UK's National Weather Service, updated global temperatures for 2012 and the new dataset shows that an “unlikely” event has occurred, according to their own models: Global warming has been halted for 15 years and counting.

While the MET Office accused critics of cherry-picking a starting point and nitpicked about language-for example the Daily Mail reported that the “Met Office report [was] quietly released,” while the Met office whined they just...

Sunday, May 19 | 01:12 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 01:12 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 01:12 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 01:12 AM ET