In response to:

What's Wrong with Public Nudity?

Enrique25 Wrote: Dec 06, 2012 6:16 PM
here is why I would go with liar: ever since Obama was elected, Prager has gone WAY out of his way to ignore most of what Obama does and says, because the actual Obama record would prove him obviously to be a centrist, and often in agreement with Prager himself. On issue after issue, most recently Gaza, Prager if he were honest would be acknowledging that he and Obama are in agreement, but he can't, because he is intent on maintaining his ENORMOUS four year lie, the silly "civil war". Whatever happened to that Prager Rational Guard, anyway...
The Original King Wrote: Dec 06, 2012 7:29 PM
Enrique................I'd forgotten all about that Prager Rational Guard. Methinks it died of natural causes a few years ago. At any rate, I really don't understand how anyone can hear the aforementioned quote by Prager and have ANY respect for what he has to say. I usually find him somewhat entertaining in an Archie Bunker type of way...especially when he goes into his European stereotypes. I can just hear Archie saying the same things.."Ya know, little goyle. I'll tell ya about dem Europeans. Da whole lot of dem people only care about is dere vacation time".
If you want to understand Leftism -- and everyone needs to because it has been the most dynamic religion of the last one hundred years -- one good place to start is with San Francisco.

Or perhaps more precisely -- with nudity.

And even more precisely -- with public nudity.

Last month, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted by the barest (pun not intended) margin -- 6 to 5 -- to ban public nudity. By public nudity, the law refers only to displaying one's genitals in public. San Francisco women are still free to walk around topless. But that is not unique...

Related Tags: San Francisco Nudity