In response to:

What's Wrong with Public Nudity?

Enrique25 Wrote: Dec 04, 2012 2:58 PM
What about Prager's fear of "big government" and his reverence for "individual liberty"? There, I just did the easiest thing in the world: find an inconsistency in Dennis Prager rhetoric.
rickmcq Wrote: Dec 04, 2012 3:01 PM
So you think Prager believe that :individual liberty" is absolute and unfettered?

There, I just did the easiest thing in the world: find an inconsistency in Enrique rhetoric.
Enrique25 Wrote: Dec 04, 2012 4:46 PM
Yes, when it suits Prager's purposes. When nuance is more convenient for him, then he goes for the nuance. It's all very relative.
If you want to understand Leftism -- and everyone needs to because it has been the most dynamic religion of the last one hundred years -- one good place to start is with San Francisco.

Or perhaps more precisely -- with nudity.

And even more precisely -- with public nudity.

Last month, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted by the barest (pun not intended) margin -- 6 to 5 -- to ban public nudity. By public nudity, the law refers only to displaying one's genitals in public. San Francisco women are still free to walk around topless. But that is not unique...

Related Tags: San Francisco Nudity