1 - 10 Next
In response to:

We Have a Moral Divide, Not a Racial One

Enrique25 Wrote: Nov 25, 2014 10:17 AM
Of course things aren't as clear-cut as Prager claims. Prager claims to care about objective truth, but he doesn't even come close to living up to that claim. I have heard him on his radio program over and over refuse to acknowledge perspectives other than his own very narrow one. For example black callers that challenge his views on race. The better they make their case, the angrier he gets. If you close your eyes and your ears to other perspectives, then guess what? Your own perspective looks pretty solid. You can tell yourself that that's "truth." Congratulations, you have successfully fooled yourself.
In response to:

Poverty Causes Crime?

Enrique25 Wrote: Nov 19, 2014 4:49 PM
His paternal grandparents, the ones he cites here, were bootleggers actually. I've heard his father talk about it, and he has it in his memoirs. Prager is careful here in this column to specify "violent crime", which bootlegging certainly isn't.
speaking of spinning elections... today on his show, Prager himself was spinning the election of Pope Francis. He said that the cardinals didn't understand as Prager does that Latin Americans is a hotbed of leftism. They just picked him because he was a nice guy. He discounts the possibility that the bishops judged what Prager calls "leftism" to be what they call Christianity. But Prager of course knows more about Christianity than the bishops
i remember before the 2012 election, Dennis was hyping it up as a "referendum" on leftism. You know how he repeats things, he repeated this ad nauseum for months. But it was odd, after the election he suddenly forgot about the referendum stuff.
Dennis is shocked, SHOCKED that pundits spin election results in their side's favor.
In response to:

The Left's Tactics -- a Personal Example

Enrique25 Wrote: Nov 06, 2014 12:05 PM
I'm not sure what you're trying to say, can you repeat it?
today Prager called that GOP official a "coward" and demanded he apologize. He says the victory in Florida is a vindication of his rape comments. Which I'm sure is totally true lol.
Yes, I lost, so did you. Prager won, and his friends that are buying our government.
The difference between conservatives and liberals is that when liberals unfairly characterize people's words, they are honest in providing the context so the reader can judge whether the characterization. For example I read Wonkette's article and judged that the headline was not true, because the full context was readily available linked right from the Wonkette article. Also, conservatives target powerful public figures such as Dennis Prager. By contrast, when conservatives attack, they deceptively edit videos so the context can't be seen. Also, conservatives go after normal people, and get them fired based on their lies. I'm talking about Breitbart may he rest in peace, and James O'Keefe, both of whom got ordinary people FIRED based on their lies. Lies which the self-proclaimed "TRUTH LOVER" Dennis Prager has no problem with. In fact both of these folks Breitbart and O'Keefe are in great favor with MR. TRUTH Dennis Prager.
I would just like to point out that you are parroting a Dennis Prager talking point about the neatness of liberal protests vs. conservative ones. The fact that you do not cite Prager suggests that you don't realize this, that you think that the thought is your own.
1 - 10 Next