1 - 4
In response to:

Something Rotten in the State

English2 Wrote: Apr 24, 2012 3:05 AM
Mr Carter allowed the slaughter of over 1 million Cambodians on the killing fields because he was a pacifist and puppet. I do appreciate his desire for peace, but sitting by during the slaughter is inexcusable.
In response to:

A Nation Arms Itself -- For What?

English2 Wrote: Apr 03, 2012 11:16 AM
If it was paranoia, it was well-founded. Today's government underscores the need for the second Amendment.
In response to:

A Nation Arms Itself -- For What?

English2 Wrote: Apr 03, 2012 11:15 AM
They needed at least one place to keep their money.
In response to:

A Nation Arms Itself -- For What?

English2 Wrote: Apr 03, 2012 11:13 AM
Mdm Hillary Clinton would not agree with you Mr Buchanan. That is why she personally influenced Fast and Furious and why she advocates for a UN treaty against personal weapons. Her position is in violation of the US Constitution second amendment, in violation of her oath of office to protect it. The second Amendment is written so that citizens have the right to protect themselves from abusive governments.
1 - 4