In response to:

Notorious Anti-Islam YouTube Video Not Mentioned in Clinton Testimony

EndTheSecond Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 3:36 PM
What is the beef against her -- she didn't get the cables.
Dyadd Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 3:49 PM
Good point! Why would the Sec. of State see a cable from an Ambassador in a war zone complaining about security?

Doesn't the Post Office handle things like that?
anderson659 Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 3:38 PM
People want to know why Americans died after screaming fro help and holding off attackers in anticipation of help.

Perhaps Hillary can explain her statement about a video being responsible, that was an outright lie.
DSMike Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 3:38 PM
So where does the buck stop if not at the top?
SwimwareIsMe Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 3:39 PM
The buck stops with Bush. Don't you know?
EndTheSecond Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 3:45 PM
Then the issue would be why she did not know. That's a good question. When it comes to scandals, you always swing for the fences. Makes you look like idiots.
DSMike Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 3:49 PM

UPDATE: During Clinton's testimony in front of the House Armed Services Committee Wednesday afternoon, Reps. Dana Rohrabacher, Matt Salmon and Mo Brooks mentioned the anti-Islam film originally blamed for the attack. Clinton danced around the subject by saying the investigation into what happened in Benghazi is ongoing. The best exchange was between Clinton and Brooks:


U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens sent multiple requests for more security to the State Department throughout 2012 and cited al Qaeda threats as a reason why it was needed. The extra security was never...