1 - 9
In response to:

'Duck Dynasty' and A Free Society

Elliot26 Wrote: Dec 25, 2013 1:21 PM
I figured out the agenda of the secular-progressives. They want the whole duck dynasty to quit show-business and go to medical school. As the Obamacare networks shrink, Americans will be left with a choice of quacks.
I'm not a lawyer, but I don't get it. If the land is sold to a private organization, what possible legal objection could there be?
In response to:

Syria and Obama

Elliot26 Wrote: Sep 10, 2013 1:09 PM
I greatly admire Thomas Sowell, and I think he's made some excellent points, but, as some commenters have mentioned, there are consequences to not acting as well, and given that Obama got us into this mess, we have to think very carefully about damage control. I don't understand his point about WWII. Chamberlain earned Hitler's contempt by his infamous "Peace for our time" [BTW, he did not say IN our time] Munich Agreement. By the time Hitler invaded Poland, it is clear that his goal was world conquest. Britain ultimately did save Poland, because had Britian remained silent, Poland and the rest of Europe would still be living under a Nazi regime.
I don't understand why they can't be prosecuted. They belong in jail.
In response to:

Killers for Human Rights

Elliot26 Wrote: Aug 04, 2013 9:02 AM
How loud would these liberal hypocrites be screaming if the system failed to protect a black inmate from a white murderer.
In response to:

Five Annoying Types Of Republicans

Elliot26 Wrote: Jun 23, 2013 9:20 PM
I'm starting a fund to provide winter coats for people in Hell, in case the liberal media decide to admit they werre wrong and to aplogize to Bush.
People who apologize for being politically incorrect or doing something they have a perfect right to do are doing a disservice to the country.
Where is your spell checker? "Stalinist" is not spelled D-e-m-o-c-r-a-t. (Well, actually ....) Seriously, it's refreshing to see a leftist actually being honest about his agenda. Why not adopt a system which has led every country who tried it to starvation or bankruptcy?
Dr_Zinj, your comment only illustrates the "slippery slope" that is initiated by justifications for abortion. There is, in fact, a so-called "ethicist" at Princeton (Singer) who reasons that children below some arbitrary age are not reasoning beings and can therefore be done away with. Once you deny the non-negotiable sanctity of life, you open the door to the Nazis.
1 - 9