The real point is that those who are ardent believers that man is the reason for climate change are also wanting to use expensive draconian measures that could very easily cause massive hardship for many people.

Intelligent people are not denying that the climate is changing. The only real quarrel is what is the CAUSE of that change? Humans, or just the nature of our universe? Therein lies the problem. It is a scientific fact that earth has gone through major climate shifts over the years, but only recently has it been popular for some to believe that mankind is the major motivator of our changing climate. If that is true then why was there change before there were as many people inhabiting earth as there are today? And why would human emission be the cause of change today when the climate also changed when humans were not living in the manner, and with the technological advances, that we have today that are supposedly changing our climate?

You must be the only one who doesn't understand what KYoung43 wrote. Makes perfect sense to me, especially the part of how long it will take to get this country back on track -- that is if we ever CAN get it back on track given that so many live off government dole rather than want to work. They will continue to elect those who will contine the gravy train, and will do so until the train comes to a halt.

No he didn't, but the Democratic party did -- with one or two votes from people who insist they are Republicans but vote and act like Democrats. And if the word on the street is correct, he had to bribe a number of Democratic senators to vote for the bill, otherwise it wouldn't even pass at all. You are buying into the "Republicans are obstructionists" propaganda of the MSM and the Democratic Party. Many Republicans need to shape up but they did NOT support Obamacare, or a lot of other things Obama and the Democrates have done or are trying to do that will take this country down the road to socialism.

You have got to be kidding. Obama articulate? Have you heard him off teleprompter? He is a good speaker only if you like being yelled at. His voice is coarse and grating and his delivery with his nose in the air never looking at anyone (he did that BEFORE he began depending on the teleprompter) seems arrogant -- certainly never friendly bringing the audience into the conversation. In other words, his ability to communicate in a warm and friendly way is on a par with his performance in all other areas. Terrible.

Ah, but Jesus DID remain silent when faced by his accusers. It was when he was surrounded by people who would listen to him that he was not silent.

And George Bush will gallantly not say a negative word in response. Even though George Bush and I disagreed on a lot of things, you have to admit that his silence has been golden since he left office. Obama rather reminds me of the bully who keeps kicking the kid when he is down -- the bully looks like a bully to everyone around him and he is too dumb to realize the disdain others are feeling toward him. .

I am sure that Obama wants to kill the program is because it "isn't fair" for some to get a leg up over others. Isn't that his theme -- move everyone to the lowest common denominator? Oh, wait. I forgot -- his kids don't go to "those" schools.

I read this a long time ago. Your answer is "Yes", Obama was for making it legal. Whether it actually passed or not I don't know.

And what do you think they will do with old people? If they can do it to the helpless young it can and will happen to our senior citizens when they are no long of "value". When my husband died I realized what a wealth of knowledge died with him -- so it will be in our future. Won't it be wonderful when our country is run by teenagers -- or teenager like "adults"? Can't happen? Just watch.