In response to:

The New York Times Calls (again) for Higher Taxes on Middle-Class Americans

El_Loco_JP Wrote: Feb 23, 2013 8:59 AM
If you want to raise money, tax welfare, food stamps, Obama phones, housing subsidies and all the other freebies that social deadbeats receive. Just a few percent tax would balance the national budget.
patrioticgalwithphd Wrote: Feb 23, 2013 12:33 PM
I really have a problem with providing all of the above free stuff to the young able-bodied freeloading Obama Mammas! I had ONE child and took care of him by working.
Snarkasterous1 Wrote: Feb 23, 2013 6:23 PM
Patriot.....

Do you, in fact, have a Ph.D.? If so, in what discipline?

- Snark
wsimpson Wrote: Feb 24, 2013 10:43 PM
Patriotic gal, I predict your child is going to be fine.
oldguy52 Wrote: Feb 23, 2013 11:04 AM
Uh..... would it just be easier to give them less in the first place???

No extra administrative costs that way.

All statists want much bigger government, but not all of them are honest about how to finance a Greek-sized welfare state.

The President, for instance, wants us to believe that the rich are some sort of fiscal pinata, capable of generating endless amounts of tax revenue.

Using IRS tax data, I’ve shown that this is a very inaccurate assumption. And I’ve also used IRS data to show the President that there are big Laffer-Curve effects when you try to rape and pillage high-income Americans.

Heck, even the Europeans have realized that...