In response to:

Exposed: Obama’s Hysterical Reaction to “Sequestration”

Egon3 Wrote: Feb 21, 2013 9:00 AM
Obama, Mugabe...what's the difference ? I just can't see any...the only "difference" is the size of the US as opposed to Zimbabwe's.
Tea Party in Wisconsin formerlyTea Party Wrote: Feb 21, 2013 12:19 PM
Bingo! And how many WHITES did Mugabe murder and how many WHITES will the Looting Usurper
murder in the future, aside from all the babies of all races he's tortured and killed in the womb and those who survive the first torture attempts.
katepatate Wrote: Feb 21, 2013 9:17 AM
Got that right. Mugabe ruined South Africa, destroyed the beautiful farms the white farmers had worked years to create and I see Obama doing the same here in the states. Destroying all the evil white man created to make the country like he wants it.

Guy covered this in detail a few days ago, but there’s at least two points worth re-emphasizing: (1) The budget process commonly known as “sequestration” originated in the corridors of the White House, and was signed into law by President Obama himself. Hence, the president’s insistence that Republicans are somehow solely responsible if the negotiations fail -- and the cuts kick in -- is erroneous. (2) The negative consequences of sequestration -- discussed endlessly by this president and his lieutenants -- are exaggerated to a mystifying degree. Yuval Levin blew the lid off Team Obama’s opportunism and endless...