Wouldn't a person, in trying to prove that a theory is true, almost inadvertently remove any findings that disproved their theory. I have not seen, nor heard of any work where someone published an article on all the ways that their theory could be disproved. I'm sure that there are unplushed journals, that are limited in public access, that show every scientific step taken during their process of bringing scientific truth to their theory. You have made some valid points but I am having trouble following your statement that evolutionists ignore any evidence that does not support their preconceived notions. I haven't seen any evidence of this any where except through discussions with anyone who has bot studied or researched these topics...

Wouldn't a person, in trying to prove that a theory is true, almost inadvertently remove any findings that disproved their theory. I have not seen, nor heard of any work where someone published an article on all the ways that their theory could be disproved. I'm sure that there are unplushed journals, that are limited in public access, that show every scientific step taken during appologisong you have made some valid points but I am having trouble following your statement that evolutionists ignore any evidence that does not support their preconceived notions. I haven't seen any evidence of this any where except through discussions with anyone who has bot studied or researched these topics that you bring up. In this case usually they are...