In response to:

Obama's 'Battleship' Argument Has Holes in its Hull

edodaniel Wrote: Oct 26, 2012 1:12 PM
OK, lets look at the fact that Clinton had a REPUBLICAN MAJORITY in Congress that, while still overspending on welfare and social spending didn't go to the extremes that the Democrat Congress that loves to spend, did under the Bush second term in which the huge deficits began and which have only grown bigger under the Democrat Congress and Admin since this Obama who is not even a qualified for the office as he, having a Kenyan father is not a natural born citizen as the Constitution REQUIRES in Article II Section 1. "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents...." --James Madison

In the third and final debate, Barack Obama scored huge points with the media, college kids and die-hard liberals -- in other words, his base -- when he mocked Mitt Romney's concern about our historically small Navy.

"But I think Governor Romney maybe hasn't spent enough time looking at how our military works," the president said. "You -- you mentioned the Navy, for example, and that we have fewer ships than we did in 1916. Well, Governor, we also have fewer horses and bayonets because the nature of our military's changed. We have these things called aircraft carriers where planes...