In response to:

How Gays and Women Get In Their Own Way

eddie again Wrote: Feb 04, 2013 1:01 PM
what is your definition of dangerous? do you mean physically threatening? if so, you should use those words because the word dangerous is not limited to meaning physically threatening. people can be dangerous because they influence others to engage in self-damaging behaviors, societally damaging behaviors and spiritually damaging behaviors. based on that understanding there are tens of millions of americans who find homosexuals who insist on publicizing their sexual desires to be "dangerous".

Gays can be leaders. Women can be leaders. Without realizing it, I think gays and women inadvertently work against their own objective of equality when they force private organizations to support gay and female leaders.

As I wrote here, gays and women are already equal before the Constitution, which defines us by our humanity, not by our sexuality, and is silent on most personal matters like marriage. Furthermore, the more the federal government defines our rights, the less free, equal and human we all become.

Here is what generally happens when minority groups confuse social acceptance with equality...