Previous 11 - 20 Next
In response to:

Obama Criticism Should Be Banned?

eddie again Wrote: Feb 25, 2015 5:18 PM
he also denigrated Christians by equating them with violent extremists. he also insisted that the cross be covered when he is in the room. he also never goes to church nor claims to be a member of any Christian denomination. he also is very ignorant of Christian teachings and Christian history. he also supports islam over Christianity. in his own words, he said his faith is the muslim faith. he said that in public on tv.
In response to:

Obama Criticism Should Be Banned?

eddie again Wrote: Feb 25, 2015 5:14 PM
regardless of whether or not Obama is a Christian or a patriot, it is safe and accurate to conclude that Obama is seriously damaging freedom, liberty and justice in this country. although perhaps using the terms freedom, liberty and justice might require further definition since for Obama, leftists, progressives and members of the democrat party words only mean what they want them to mean. kind of like marriage, marriage no longer means what it has always meant. for leftists, progressives and members of the democrat party, marriage now means government sanctioned "special friendships", nothing more. of course Obama and the democrats think government recognition of "special friendships" is more important than having an institution dedicated to the procreation and well-being of children. they call that institution bigoted because they believe "special friendships" (which of course have NO INTRINSIC VALUE to society) are more important than children. meanwhile the federal judges think that no only are "special friendships" more important than the well-being of children, they (the federal judges) think that "special friendships" should be supported by taxpayers' dollars. the judges think this for, as near as can be determined, the sole reason that the judges are in control and they can force such nonsense down the American people's throats. of course they are right about this because our elected representatives are only concerned with staying in office and what is good for America is irrelevant to them.
In response to:

Obama Criticism Should Be Banned?

eddie again Wrote: Feb 25, 2015 5:06 PM
should not the terms be defined before being used. does Obama, walker, the mainstream media and everyone else agree on what Christian and patriot mean? if not, how can they use the terms rationally. and, if they are not using the terms rationally, then they are using them irrationally and it is best if we all just completely disregard the mainstream media as being completely irrational.
the internet is nothing like radio, television, the u.s. mail, transportation, communication or telephones. other than that is what totalitarians do, why should the government be involved in regulating it?
I prefer will_ethan provide his/her evidence that only the physical world exists. since we all know this cannot happen because such evidence does not exist, perhaps he/she could give even a little evidence to support his/her FAITH belief that only the physical world exists. I am certain that there is far more evidence that supports the belief that there exists far more than the physical universe than evidence that only the physical universe exists (since there is no evidence that only the physical universe exists.
I prefer will_ethan provide his/her evidence that only the physical world exists. since we all know this cannot happen because such evidence does not exist, perhaps he/she could give even a little evidence to support his/her FAITH belief that only the physical world exists. I am certain that there is far more evidence that supports the belief that there exists far more than the physical universe than evidence that only the physical universe exists (since there is no evidence that only the physical universe exists.
except that you are unable to provide that science, someone might believe you. provide the science if you want to be taken seriously. for example, when you use the term evolution you display your ignorance. evolution involves many claims and answers only some questions. "evolution" taken as a monolithic scientific theory does not even exist. who is the ignorant one? my guess, the ignorant ones are those who use evolution as though it is a monolithic scientific fact.
sorry, but your low level of expertise and total absence of concurrence precludes anyone from accepting your testimony as containing truth.
hundreds of millions is even more accurate.
leftists, progressives and democrats do not use facts. they prefer to act like foaming at the mouth mad dogs where nothing matters but their rage and overwhelming desire to control and impose their wills on others. I call it the "one tin soldier syndrome". you know, fight until only you are left and then declare yourself the victor. it is called a pyrrhic victory although they do not realize it.
the federal government is the gravest threat to Americans' freedom and liberty that exists today. that is mostly because the people we elect become totalitarian so as to entrench their importance and power.
Previous 11 - 20 Next