Previous 11 - 20 Next
In response to:

Max Allen: Chief Divisiveness Officer

eddie again Wrote: Oct 20, 2014 2:10 PM
does the diversity office cover offenses against the beliefs of devout Roman Catholics?
I should have been clearer. state created same-sex personal relationships provide NOTHING OF VALUE to society. personal friendships and private clubs, etc. do provide value to society. but this state imagined concept called same-sex marriage is not based on society's need for such a concept, but is primarily an embracing of greed for some at the expense of others by the government.
never forget, same-sex personal relationships provide NOTHING OF VALUE to society.
someone needs to create a pamphlet that details how two members of the same-sex can safely job the system to greedily take whatever they can get from taxpayers. the first item included in the pamphlet should be a standard pre-nup that will ensure no one is harmed financially by entering in to a government created and sanctioned personal contract that has nothing to do with love or sex. the whole idea behind the pamphlet would be to let straight guys and gals get in on the greed that the government has decided American taxpayers can easily afford. since the government has declared that there is NO CONNECTION between marriage and children, same-sex marriage is totally about greed. okay may be a few of those supporting same-sex marriage are motivated by hatred of righteous living and the desire to destroy the good that is Christian marriage.
according to the government, marriage has nothing to do with the well-being of children. according to the government, marriage is an institution designed to get material wealth from others. for the government it is nothing more and nothing less. how do we know this? because, there are no reasonable restrictions on who can gain the money. two buddies doing it for a lark? just fine with the government. two people who meet at an online website designed to bring together people who greedily want to gain financial benefits by jobbing the system? the whole same-sex marriage bit is driven by greed nothing else. society has no vested interest in a personal relationship between two people of the same-sex, but that does not stop ignorant and perhaps stupid federal judges from imposing the consequences of greed upon taxpaying americans.
according to the government, marriage has nothing to do with the well-being of children. according to the government, marriage is an institution designed to get material wealth from others. for the government it is nothing more and nothing less. how do we know this? because, there are no reasonable restrictions on who can gain the money. two buddies doing it for a lark? just fine with the government. two people who meet at an online website designed to bring together people who greedily want to gain financial benefits by jobbing the system? the whole same-sex marriage bit is driven by greed nothing else. society has no vested interest in a personal relationship between two people of the same-sex, but that does not stop ignorant and perhaps stupid federal judges from imposing the consequences of greed upon taxpaying americans.
the government has totally severed the well-being of children from the definition of marriage.
In response to:

CBS Drives Away 'Anti-Gay' Catholics

eddie again Wrote: Oct 17, 2014 12:14 PM
human beings are free to entertain any thoughts they choose. no human being is forced to think a particular way. we all have the power to control our thoughts. because thoughts serve as mother (give birth) to acts, none of the sexual perversions being touted by the progressives and elitists are innate. any one experiencing these temptations can, with effort, eliminate them from influencing a person through continuous and conscientious effort. the most appalling thing happening in this arena of glorifying sexual perversions is that the government is forcing little children to learn about these perversions long before most children even think about them. the government is putting these thoughts in the minds of innocent children and it is doing it on purpose. it is totally a product of the imagination when a human beings think they are members of the sex opposite their physical sex. it is an out of control imagination similar to an obsessive compulsive disorder. these people who think they are a sex different from their biology are mentally ill and should be treated as mentally ill by the government.
sounds like another solyndra, does not it? no one will ever be able to say that Obama did not pay off for his buddies. corruption of the highest degree, nothing more and nothing less. our tax dollars corruptly enriching Obama and his buddies.
how about the government run schools forcing children who have not reached the age of puberty to think about sex when they would not be doing so except for the government forcing it upon them? this is rank child abuse and no one objects. it will be a cold day in hades before anyone can adequately justify this child abuse by the government and probably before most americans even understand how abusive these government imposed acts are. five year olds forcibly indoctrinated in to a sexual life long before they need to be. five year olds deprived of their innocence for no other reason than that the government can use violence against us to force this loss of innocence upon them.
if you want to advocate for making every American who wants to marry prove their fertility, go ahead. but I doubt that is what you really want. also, now women who have passed menopause can have children using the correct medical technology. so, while you attack the alleged fertility of all Americans who want to marry you must also weigh in modern medical science. further, most of us are talking about the institution that respects the relationship that involves procreation, not the individuals that seek to enter the institution. these are two different issues whether you understand that or not. you want to eliminate state recognition of the institution that results in procreation. finally, the article was more about the willingness of judges, who have no respect for the constitution or reason or logic, to impose their values on millions of people who disagree with them
Previous 11 - 20 Next