In response to:

What's Wrong with Public Nudity?

Earl50 Wrote: Dec 04, 2012 4:10 PM
I am always skeptical of posts that begin with a proclamation that is usually followed with comments totally at odds with that proclamation. Similar to the seminar callers who all proclaim, "I agree with everything you say and I voted for Bush twice" followed by a nonsensical left wing rant. I can certainly understand why this past was anonymous because if I found out they participated in a nude event with underage children that included one of mine he or she would need medical attention. The event you described is probably a felony and at the very least you should be a registered sex offender so parents know what kind of person you are.
If you want to understand Leftism -- and everyone needs to because it has been the most dynamic religion of the last one hundred years -- one good place to start is with San Francisco.

Or perhaps more precisely -- with nudity.

And even more precisely -- with public nudity.

Last month, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted by the barest (pun not intended) margin -- 6 to 5 -- to ban public nudity. By public nudity, the law refers only to displaying one's genitals in public. San Francisco women are still free to walk around topless. But that is not unique...

Related Tags: San Francisco Nudity