Previous 11 - 20 Next
In response to:

Guess Who Bailed on Lerner's Contempt Vote?

E1776 Wrote: May 08, 2014 9:09 AM
Except for the botox. There, she's first in line.
In response to:

Guess Who Bailed on Lerner's Contempt Vote?

E1776 Wrote: May 08, 2014 9:07 AM
Had to think for a second, then bingo. Water, Wicked Witch. LMAO.
In response to:

Finding the Truth at Benghazi

E1776 Wrote: May 08, 2014 8:52 AM
Witch Doc X, maybe we should have applied the same standards to NIxon. Demoncraps were trying to fault Nixon, truth doesn't matter to Democraps, they were trying to get even with Nixon. So we shouldn't have believed anything that Democraps found in the Watergate investigations? Was it Democraps crying wolf too many times? See how turning the issue around, and applying your standards to Democrap scandals, rings hollow?
The establishment of a Presidential committee does not absolve Nichol of responsibility. Who takes the final decision? Nichol, of course. Dr. Adams quotes Nichol who wrote that censorship has no place at his university, yet Nichol censors the Christians by removing the Cross. No obfuscation.
Brilliant. I have been thinking about the new bigotry even before Dr. Adam's statement. There are many bigots who are not called to answer for their words and sometimes actions. Not just the religious bigots who are plentiful and increasing. I am thinking of the many hateful minorities who verbally, and sometimes physically, attack the majority whites. Are they ever punished in any way? Shouldn't hateful speech and acts be recognized and condemned no matter the target?
In response to:

Look Her in the Eye

E1776 Wrote: Apr 28, 2014 11:48 AM
Ok, you go first. Submit your DNA to the Feds and let them do whatever they wish with it. If you say, yes, you have nothing to hide, then how about all your children, grandchildren and everyone in your family? Still, ok with that? We do have civil rights, no?
In response to:

Look Her in the Eye

E1776 Wrote: Apr 28, 2014 11:36 AM
Excellent point. The pro-abortion crowd regard any abortion law tweaking as tantamount to a complete ban. They use terms like stopping a "woman's right" to control her body, "war on women". Conservatives need to change the debate terms to change the argument and perception.
In response to:

George Will Takes On Stephen Colbert

E1776 Wrote: Apr 26, 2014 10:31 AM
So true. Mr. Colbert is such a doofus. He tried to bait Mr. Will, but he made himself look stupid. I'm glad I never watch Colbert. Now, he's going to take over Letterman's Late Night. Another show to put on my list -to never watch.
If the leftists, democraps can obfuscate, then rig the elections with illegal votes and outright fraud, then they can win again. There are still enough dumb voters, benefit recipients, crony businessmen, socialists, aka their base, to get them close.
In response to:

On Treating Putin as Pariah

E1776 Wrote: Apr 25, 2014 9:26 AM
Excuse me, I don't see any call for war or troops in anything I wrote. The key sentences and thoughts are: 1) not giving up and 2) turning "up the heat in every OTHER way". The U.S. was successful in blunting Soviet advances without war by mobilizing support, even in unusual ways, such as Reagan's alliance with the Pope. The Europeans have be cajoled into bucking up their defenses. U.S. leaders have to publicly make the case for containing aggression and rally world support.. Clandestine support should always be an option. We should not be in the weak situation in the first place, if we had strong leaders. But, oh well, we are stuck with who we have (as I identified them) I guess we should just give up, according to everyone.
In response to:

Obama's Dirty Watchdogs

E1776 Wrote: Apr 25, 2014 8:44 AM
Good goals and we should make the corruption and cover-ups well known. Most Republicans already know. Of course, the media will tamp down any reporting. But I have to cynically say that by the time the corruption is widely recognized it will be time for Obozo to leave office.
Previous 11 - 20 Next