"Oh, Good God," -- aren't you just the bright one in your family? -- your parents must be so proud! I agree w/ Southwest Gal NM: Why don't you take your "overfed lazy americans" fat a** over there so you're no "sorry chumps play on your keyboards here at Townhall!"? Do you consciously believe that "threads on the Egyptian revolution" would accomplish anything substantial if they're already in the throes of "fighting and dying for democracy and freedom"? If you're truly "so tired of this dull, childish american bickering!", please stop reading it and spare all others of your space. OBTW: you're right about 1 thing -- Ann, Hugh, nor Glenn have made it an ISSUE, so apparently, IT ISN'T!

SPOT ON! I already feel like most Germans after WW-II: Hitler was not only evil and dangerous, but, in retrospect, a national AND international embarrassment! Similar personality disorders maybe? I'm already embarrassed for us collectively!

Tinsidr2 Wrote: " … the exact quote saying children of IMMIGRANTS were meant to be citizens." Yes, children of IMMIGRANTS were meant to be citizens, and I seriously doubt that any logical person would disagree with that statement, IF they hold a common definition of IMMIGRANT. Shouldn't we interpret the definition of IMMIGRANT to mean a foreign, non-U.S.-citizen who has completed the necessary application forms and processes satisfying statutory (legal) requirements to move here on intent of becoming a U.S. citizen? If so, doesn't the word IMMIGRANT, on its own, carry an implied and inherent sense of legality?? And isn't an IMMIGRANT, then, legally different from an un-invited foreign visitor/laborer??? It's so very disappointing to...

Tinsidr2 Wrote: " … the exact quote saying children of IMMIGRANTS were meant to be citizens." Yes, children of IMMIGRANTS were meant to be citizens, and I seriously doubt that any logical person would disagree with that statement, IF they hold a common definition of IMMIGRANT. Shouldn't we interpret the definition of IMMIGRANT to mean a foreign, non-U.S.-citizen who has completed the necessary application forms and processes satisfying statutory (legal) requirements to move here on intent of becoming a U.S. citizen? If so, doesn't the word IMMIGRANT, on its own, carry an implied and inherent sense of legality?? And isn't an IMMIGRANT, then, legally different from an un-invited foreign visitor/laborer??? It's so very disappointing...

Socialist, anti-Constitution DOJ attorneys are like rats: for every one you see or eradicate, another dozen remain in hiding, pending opportunity to 'make their mark'!