1 - 10 Next
The Liberty Amendments, by Mark Levin is a good start.
Now is the time to call your State Legislative bodies and demand that they pass a resolution calling for an Article V Convention of the States. Once 33 States demand such a convention, one must be held. And since the GOP controls 70% of the partisan houses, plus Nebraska, they will control the delegates and thus the agenda. They can reclaim their Constitutional powers which have been usurped by the Feds. Call your State Represenative and Senators today and demand it.
In response to:

Misreading Jefferson on Church and State

DVangura Wrote: Nov 06, 2014 1:21 PM
Our Founders and Framers did not want a national church. The quote below from Madison is directed at a national church. . But any reading of our Founders show that they did indeed want religious expression in the public sector. The First Amendment left the matters of religion to the States. To answer the question below (from Madisonwannabe), it was John Adams who wrote, "Because we have no government, armed with power, capable of contending with human passions, unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge and licentiousness would break the strongest cords of our Constitution, as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." George Washington also warned, "Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports . . . And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion. Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle."
The Catholic Church has always been a science oriented institution. Several of the priest who have added to our sceintific knowledge and advance the cause of sciene have been honor by having lunar craters named in thier honor. The 35 Lunar Craters Named to Honor Jesuit Scientists http://faculty.fairfield.edu/jmac/sj/scientists/lunacrat.htm The father of Geology was a Catholic Priest http://jloughnan.tripod.com/geolpriest.htm And since the conflict between Galileo and the Church is pretty much the only evidence offered by progresives condeming the Church as "anti-science" here is a quote from St. Robert Bellarmine who supported Galileo, "that the sun did not travel around the earth but the earth circled the sun, then it would be necessary to proceed with great caution in explaining the passages of Scripture that appear contrary. And we would rather have to say that we did not understand them than to say that something was false which has been established.” http://www.traditioninaction.org/History/A_003_Galileo.html
In response to:

Is the French Revolution Our New Model?

DVangura Wrote: Oct 09, 2014 10:31 AM
"Who" is nomitavie or the subject. That is the one doing the action of the verb. "Whom" is the direct object (accusative) or indirect object (dative). Thus it is used in the predecate part of the sentence. "Whose" is the possevive (genative) form. Thus, "who" is correct above. An example of "whom" is, "To whom are you talking?"
This is why all schools should have school uniforms.
In response to:

Multiculturalism Is a Failure

DVangura Wrote: Sep 17, 2014 9:23 AM
Multiculturalism is the result of loosing our "national morality." Georg Washington warned us when he penned the following in his Farewell Address. Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism, who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens. The mere politician, equally with the pious man, ought to respect and to cherish them. A volume could not trace all their connections with private and public felicity. Let it simply be asked: Where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths which are the instruments of investigation in courts of justice ? And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion. Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.
"What would they say then, (sic)" WE would say that it is their own private business and they are free to give discounts to ANYONE they want. FFRF is attacking and oppresing the civil rights of this business owner. He should file a counter suit and sue FFRF. If anything, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects First Amendment Rights.
Not only is the Gold-Standarb a better policy because of its stability, it is also mandated by Article I, Section 10 of the US Constitution, "No State shall . . . make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts . . . ."
In response to:

Why Lie? We are at War with Mexico

DVangura Wrote: Jul 07, 2014 6:11 PM
It is obvious now that the leftist leadership is filled with traitors who are actively working to destroy our Nation.
1 - 10 Next