1 - 10 Next
In response to:

Is the French Revolution Our New Model?

DVangura Wrote: Oct 09, 2014 10:31 AM
"Who" is nomitavie or the subject. That is the one doing the action of the verb. "Whom" is the direct object (accusative) or indirect object (dative). Thus it is used in the predecate part of the sentence. "Whose" is the possevive (genative) form. Thus, "who" is correct above. An example of "whom" is, "To whom are you talking?"
This is why all schools should have school uniforms.
In response to:

Multiculturalism Is a Failure

DVangura Wrote: Sep 17, 2014 9:23 AM
Multiculturalism is the result of loosing our "national morality." Georg Washington warned us when he penned the following in his Farewell Address. Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism, who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens. The mere politician, equally with the pious man, ought to respect and to cherish them. A volume could not trace all their connections with private and public felicity. Let it simply be asked: Where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths which are the instruments of investigation in courts of justice ? And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion. Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.
"What would they say then, (sic)" WE would say that it is their own private business and they are free to give discounts to ANYONE they want. FFRF is attacking and oppresing the civil rights of this business owner. He should file a counter suit and sue FFRF. If anything, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects First Amendment Rights.
Not only is the Gold-Standarb a better policy because of its stability, it is also mandated by Article I, Section 10 of the US Constitution, "No State shall . . . make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts . . . ."
In response to:

Why Lie? We are at War with Mexico

DVangura Wrote: Jul 07, 2014 6:11 PM
It is obvious now that the leftist leadership is filled with traitors who are actively working to destroy our Nation.
I am tired of these RACIST democRATS and self-hating blacks constantly showing their hatred and disdane toward black citizens and black communities. How dare they say that black people are not smart enough to aquire photo ids, or are less inteligent than white or asian citezens and thus must have lower standards on all types of exams (college entrance exams, and performance exams and/or promotion exams). It is disgusting that the RACIST media covers for and promotes such racist statements. It time to call out these racists for what they are.
This article is the reason I am for leagalizing drugs. Government at all levels are using the "war on drugs" to become paramilitary units and that is a greater threat to all Americans than drug use. Legalizing drugs would also devestate the drug cartels and would take away most of their funding. And people could then sue the manufactures and supplies in a court of law for the harm done. Look at what is going on with tobacco and alcohol.
In response to:

Raw Numbers for School Shootings

DVangura Wrote: Jun 30, 2014 12:09 PM
PLEASE STOP USING THE NAMES OF THESE INSANE MONSTERS!!!! I wish these columnist and bloggers wouls stop giving theses deranged maniacs the glory that the seek, which then encourages the next insane animal. You can talk about Columbine, Newton, Virginia Tech and any other shooting WITHOUT naming the gunman. Call them "gunman" or "shooter" or something else. STOP USING THERE EF'IN NAMES.
The bill also need to add a provision that holds government officials personally liable for any harm done in both civil and criminal courts. The bull exrement of holding tax payers liable for the abusive and oppresive acts of leftist officials, while protecting the later from prosecution needs to end.
1 - 10 Next