Previous 11 - 20 Next
In response to:

Senate to Start Votes on Gun Bill

Dusty44 Wrote: Apr 17, 2013 11:03 AM
Really, background checks aren't free, one has to pay to exercise a right. Suppose you had to pay a small fee each time you voted, went to church, met friends at a public place or even a buck each time you posted an ill informed comme t on a website? Yes, background checks do violate one's rights.
I advocate only allowing people to vote, go to church, post on message boards and even speak wo are competent and responsible. Also, all cars should be governed to travel no faster that 65 mph. As long as we want to infringe a right, we may as well infringe other rights.
Actually, I agree the term "illegal immigrant" is incorrect . A more correct term would be "Criminal Trespasser"
Not nearly as much as ill informed or worse illigal voteres, but the left won't even consider requring ID to vote.
Yep, again with democrats in office
As always a great article by Katie. However I still take mild issue with "...the legislation is simply anti-illegal immigrant" I would much perfer "...the legislation is simply anti-CRIMINAL TRESPASSER"
Well the part about being a shame he can't fire them all is true. So what's wrong with evaluating the job they are paid (quite well) to do? They are employed for the sole purpose of educating children, that's it. If the students' scores are not up to par, the employees did not do what they were paid to do and should be let go. Seriously, how could anyone have a gripe with that...... Do your job or be let go.
http://pjmedia.com/blog/disgrace-doj-fails-to-protect-military-voting-rights/
In response to:

Exposing Obama's Criminal Friends

Dusty44 Wrote: Jul 16, 2012 9:25 AM
How about we talk about jobs and the economy? Hmmmmmm?
In response to:

The Romney Coronation Begins?

Dusty44 Wrote: Apr 03, 2012 7:00 PM
Obama turned himself in?
Previous 11 - 20 Next