This man has lost his everlovin' mind, not to mentiion his pretense of objectivity.

Short answer to your title question -- no, never, not as long as the media lick his boots and crucify anyone who dares to question anything he does or says.

I think it's a great idea to let anyone who says they are a citizen and they are of age just go ahead and vote. Doesn't matter if they are lying or not. Don't ask them to back up their assertions. Don't ask them if they have already voted. Just let them vote. After all, it's a right. Isn't that what most polling places are already doing?

Scientific evidence contradicts their agenda, so scientific evidence will be discredited if possible, and buried otherwise. Carbon taxes are too tempting for the politicians to pass up. Science textbooks have been preaching this gobbledegook about man-made global warming for more than a couple of decades, even in spite of contradictory evidence. This way, the general public is already predisposed to believe the politicians.

It's "dihydrogen oxide," and you're right. They will probably ban than next. It has been responsible for the deaths of millions over the years.

As far as I know, he is still in jail. Apprently, they DID get away with it. The election is over and the Messiah won. All is right with the world. Dead Americans? Oh well, I guess they are just "collateral damage."

Couldn't have said it better. The MSM loudly echo their talking points and wholeheartedly endorse their power grabs.

The EPA absolutely lost it in my (scientific) opinion when it declared carbon dioxide harmful to the environment and started this insane unscientific, but hightly lucrative (for government) policy of carbon taxes. Carbon dioxide is exhaled with every breath from every animal and is a necessary reactant in photosynthesis, which produces atmospheric oxygen. If carbon dioxide is produced, photosynthetic rate increases, thus removing it from the atmosphere. Photosynthesis and aerobic respiration are in oppositional equilibrium. The EPA tends to overlook this relationship, which is necessary to maintain life on this planet. Their science on global warming is not, as the EPA claims, settled science, either.

He's a Democrat. Absolutely NOTHING will happen to him. Remember Charlie Rangel and all the other Democratic scoff-laws? Laws only apply to everyone else.

As a retired Georgia teacher, I should remind you that nowadays if students try to settle grievances in a fistfight, they will BOTH be suspended for a mandatory 10 days and BOTH will be arrested and face criminal charges as well as school penalties--even if the fight is off of school premises! A possible unintended consequence of this policy is an escallation of violence. There was an armed police officer in my school on a daily basis. I was glad and felt safer because of this policy.

The media made it seem like hundreds of thousands of people were at the anti-gun rally, while minimizing pro-gun protests. I was one of the 1.8 million people at the anti-Obamacare rally in DC in 2009 that was completely ignored by the media. Since then I have become totally skeptical of media coverage of public protests.