In response to:

Women in Combat

dterreri Wrote: Mar 31, 2013 11:52 PM
ATTENTION ALL STRONG WOMEN: as i was writing and exposing more foibles of femininity by writing more satire for my www.strongwomen.info website, i was listening to my plethora of mp3s when michael w. smith's "colorblind" came on. "better if we could be colorblind," was probably what got me thinking...it's fine to be colorblind, but don't be blind to reality. gays are blind to reality, vaginas are blind to reality. it's no wonder i've seen so many articles of how gay "men" (emotional masculivoids) are best friends with members of the lesser gender (physical masculivoids). people nowadays are colorblind to reality, so much that they would try their hardest not to think twice about driving into "the hood" at 11pm and going into a conven

A senior Defense Department official said the ban on women in combat should be lifted because the military's goal is "to provide a level, gender-neutral playing field." I'd like to think the goal of the military should be to have the toughest, meanest fighting force possible. But let's look at "gender-neutral playing field."

The Army's physical fitness test in basic training is a three-event physical performance test used to assess endurance. The minimum requirement for 17- to 21-year-old males is 35 pushups, 47 situps and a two-mile run in 16 minutes, 36 seconds or less. For females of the same age,...