In response to:

The Supreme Oxymorons

Drifter33 Wrote: Jul 01, 2012 10:38 AM
Some are trumpeting Roberts' "brilliance" from the tree-tops. I'm decrying his having totally failed at his duty. Rather than adjudicate the measure before him, Roberts bizarrely opted to re-write it--and then deigned to rule upon his own editing. Some are crowing that Roberts painted Obama into the corner. Big deal, so what? That was Boehner's job--and he's a colossal failure at that, too. Roberts' job was to safeguard the timeless tenets of our constitution, not spar with temporary presidents. I foresee us revisiting Roberts' tortured, illogical opinion many, many times in the years to come, as future unscrupulous politicians and judges take full advantage of Roberts' ill-conceived "logic".
DMZuniga Wrote: Jul 01, 2012 3:29 PM
You have no idea what you're talking about. As I explain in this monograph, Roberts did us all a much bigger favor than most of us understands...

http://www.thisbloodlessliberty.com/2012/06/john-roberts-you-sly-fox.html

In a nation of idiots, doing the right thing sometimes means making a grweat many idiots very angry. I just praise God that Mark Levin is making such a fool of himself on this. Some people just don't grasp tactical wisdom. But don't worry, you will soon enough.
Drik Wrote: Jul 01, 2012 10:45 AM
Boehner's job was to rein in Holder and he absolutely refused to have any part of that either.
Account closed Wrote: Jul 01, 2012 11:36 AM
What else do you expect him to do?
John634 Wrote: Jul 01, 2012 12:02 PM
Then why did the House vote to have Holder held in contempt? Remember, you're dealing with the Executive Branch when you refer to Holder. The bad thing is his Justice Department refuses to prosecute him.
Maybe the answer is to have the whole department held in Contempt. That way and independent prosocutor could be hired and a grand jury could be impaneled to solve the matter.
DMZuniga Wrote: Jul 01, 2012 3:30 PM
The U.S. House can remove Holder, and probably will.

With the Supreme Court’s decision in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, Obamacare has achieved its first milestone: The repudiation of logic, the Orwellian assertion that A both is and is not A.

The massive healthcare package, officially titled the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, requires that individuals buy medical insurance. The law imposes a fine on those who fail to purchase the government-approved and regulated insurance.

The legislation refers to this financial penalty 18 times. It never once refers to it as a tax. (Note: you can find