In response to:

Confirmed: Obama Made No Calls, Took No Action During Benghazi Attack

Drifter33 Wrote: Feb 16, 2013 9:02 AM
Taking action on Benghazi would have required "executive decisions" that Obama is ill equipped to make. He's a rabble-rouser; a campaigner, and nothing more. Asking this non-leader to actually execute the duties of his office is a fruitless exercise; he isn't interested in actually leading. He's interested in running our once-great nation into the ground. That's where his one and only interest lies.
InAmericaSince1627 Wrote: Feb 16, 2013 9:05 AM
I'll add, Drifter, that he is spineless when push comes to shove.
Uber Dave Wrote: Feb 16, 2013 9:13 AM
But, but , but...

...Joe Bidumb assured us the owebambi has a "spine of steel".
Seawolf Wrote: Feb 16, 2013 9:16 AM
He is a communist, he is out to destroy this nation as his father tried to do in Kenya. He hates the white power structure of this nation just as he hates US..taxing the "rich" just to hurt them, he knows the money will last just 8 days,, it's about hurting them because they are successful and it plays into his bases hatred for anyone who is successful. This guy is as much a racist as any klan member ever was..shows how stupid white liberals are.
InAmericaSince1627 Wrote: Feb 16, 2013 9:43 AM
No Dave, "spine to steal" is what he said.

Last week, Lindsey Graham's unrelenting line of questioning compelled Defense Secretary Leon Panetta to confirm under oath that not a single military asset was deployed to help rescue besieged US personnel in the course of a terrorist raid in Benghazi, Libya.  The September 11, 2012 attack lasted nearly eight hours, during which four Americans died, including our sitting ambassador.  Multiple requests for increased security in the weeks and months leading up to the massacre were denied.  Urgent warnings that the Benghazi consulate couldn't withstand a...