In response to:

3 Qualities the 2016 Republican Presidential Nominee Must Have

Dregs_are_Commies Wrote: Feb 09, 2013 3:32 PM
Tin failure, would you call his significant other a son in law, hahahahahahahahahahaaaaa......
Tinsldr2 Wrote: Feb 09, 2013 3:39 PM
Why do you care? Are you feeling left out because you are unable to make a significant and intelligent contribution to the topic being discussed?

But we know you will prove me right and keep posting troll comments like this one.

From the Urban Dictionary


Someone who is purposefully posting on a forum/messageboard/site with the sole aim to irritate the regular members.

One who posts a deliberately provocative message to a newsgroup or message board with the intention of causing maximum disruption and argument

1c. Noun
A member of an internet forum who continually harangues and harasses others. Someone with nothing worthwhile to add to a certain conversation, but rather continually threadjacks or changes the subject,
Dregs_are_Commies Wrote: Feb 09, 2013 3:41 PM
Defending the one you screwed up, a little late wouldn't you say?

I must confess in 2012 -- almost from the beginning -- I felt inclined to vote for Mitt Romney for president of the United States. His intellect, extraordinary business record, and honorable career in public service convinced me that he was uniquely qualified to serve faithfully in that office. But there was something else: As a moderate hailing from a deeply blue state, I thought he could appeal to centrist Republicans and right-leaning Independents nationwide -- perhaps enough of them to give him a decided edge on Election Day.

Unfortunately, that didn’t happen.

And yet to say that Governor Romney...