In response to:

Lawrence O'Donnell's Bible Rant - Nobody including Obama believes in the Bible

Dreadnaught011 Wrote: Jan 12, 2013 2:40 PM
Neither O'Donnell, Giglio nor you, Dread; matter at all in the wisdom being expounded upon. You're unimportant; unauthorized to speak of spiritual matters. O'Donnell is correct; Obama's "inauguration" is altogether irrelevant. He is plainly ignorant about the Word of God. His intent is not to swear an oath but to pander to voters. To do it he must egregiously pretend he's a Christian. A faithful Catholic won't take any of this seriously. The Bible is NOT Christianity's sole rule of faith; but rather WHO is authorized to expound on the Will of God. Andy 544 is no better authorized in that than Lawrence O'Donnell or pastors (so-called) who administer the spurious oath.

O'Donnell's rant has so many holes in it, but his tactic is genius: declare the Bible to be full of lies and distortion rooted in medieval law, then mock the idea that God could have written said text and you got yourself a impenetrable argument.

Let's say I can answer O'Donnell's claims regarding slavery and death sentences in the Bible, all he needs to do is throw up the "you can't prove the Bible is the inerrant Word of God" firewall. If O'Donnell really wanted honest answers to his Bible questions, he is only a couple clicks away from...