In response to:

Obama's 'Writ' Unleashed War Criminals

Dr_Zinj Wrote: Oct 03, 2012 9:03 AM
Obama broke the law on the Libyan intervention. He violated the Consitution and should have been impeached. And both then, and in hindsight, his actions were wrong for the world, and the United States. At least when the President Jefferson attacked Tripoli, it was in response to their depredations on American shipping. No such condition, or equivalent, existed to justify Obama's autocratic action.
AD15 Wrote: Oct 03, 2012 10:34 PM
No. Obama was acting at the instructions of the Bilderbergs. The Libyan oil was and is a primary source for Europe. And the Bilderbergs have to keep dissent down at home. We were acting for Europe and for the Muslim Brotherhood, who wanted control.
annfan_777 Wrote: Oct 03, 2012 2:35 PM
You are slow on the uptake. His entire life and political career has been lawless.
annfan_777 Wrote: Oct 03, 2012 2:34 PM
You are slow on the uptake. His entire life and political career has been lawless.
annfan_777 Wrote: Oct 03, 2012 2:34 PM
You are slow on the uptake. His entire life and political career has been lawless.
AD15 Wrote: Oct 03, 2012 10:35 PM
And yet Congress does nothing.
When the Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution, they made it clear that the only time the president would have the authority to use military force without prior authorization from Congress was when, as James Madison recorded in his notes from the Constitutional Convention, it was necessary to "repel sudden attacks."

It was thus fittingly symbolic that when Barack Obama announced he had ordered the U.S. military to intervene in Libya's civil war, he did not do so from the Oval Office or the well of the U.S. House of Representatives, but from the capital city of Brazil.

In that speech,...