In response to:

Obama Administration Partners With the UN to Attack the Second Amendment

Dr_Zinj Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 9:14 AM
The Senate has to ratify treaties. Unfortunately, the Democratic party, long known for their opposition to private gun ownership, has a near undefeatable lock on the Senate; which means they can impose the treaty on the country. Such an imposition is a clear violation of the second amendment, amounting to a felony crime by the Senators who so vote. As there is no legal means of preventing them from doing so, and threats to not vote for them in the next election would be futile, AND the Supreme Court would not overturn the treaty; the only way to defend the Constitution in this case will be to threaten any Senator who votes to approve it with assassination.
PaddyL Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 10:01 AM
I believe that treaty ratification requires a 2/3 ma
rendir Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 10:04 AM
Watch out for Obama to sign UN-US-Treaties and "not send it to the Senate,"

UN rules that the US has already signed onto to, say that if a UN-US-Treaty is signed by the President and not rejected by the US Congress within 3 months, the Treaty goes into effect.

Watch out for Obama to sign UN-US-Treaties and "not send it to the Senate as an end run maneuver !"

If he unprecedently tries to do this, we must use it to rightfully politically destroy, BHO, the Democrats, and any RINO's that try to reach across the anti-American-PC-aisle !
PaddyL Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 10:05 AM
Treaty ratification requires a 2/3 majority as I recall. Obama can't get it. I suspect that quite a few democrat senators would vote against ATT.
traitorbill Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 9:31 AM
They need a 2/3 vote. Good luck with that. Or maybe the Senate will just "deem" it to have passed.
The Spear Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 9:28 AM
Zinj, unfortunately, threatening any Senator who votes to approve with assassination will not work unless it can be demonstrated that your threat is a certainty.
coveyrise Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 9:21 AM
Zinj, it takes a two thirds vote in the Senate to ratify a Treaty. The Dems only have 53 seats and there are 2 Independents. That means 12 Republicans would have to vote in favor of ratification for it to be upheld. That ain't gonna happen.
RodT Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 9:25 AM
That's only if dingy Harry dosen't change the rules, like he did with Obama care.
rendir Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 9:17 AM
We must bring back the same kind of Tea Party rally we had in 2010 mid-term-elections,

Starting right now and culminating in a 2014 mid-term-election Conservative Rally !

1 of the Key-Multiple-Strategies:

We need to support a Pro-American-Tea-Party-version-of-OWS,

anti-Big-Corps-Oligarchy-Wall-St-Fed-Res-Banks-Corruption !

No more revolving door:

Wall Street, "Private-Federal-Reserve" Bank Execs, T-G ending up running the US-Treasury Dept !

T-Geithner was the New York Federal Reserve Banks Chairman before becoming the Obaminations US Treasury Secretary.

Look up Obama and Geithner family connections that go way-way back to the Ford Foundations CIA front in Indonesia, also USAID-another-worldwide-charitable-foundation-CIA-front !

Not shockingly, immediately after President Obama was reelected for a second term, his administration reinforced its support for the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty [ATT], also known as the "Small Arms Treaty." Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has been expressing full support of the treaty on behalf of the United States for years now while for political reasons, President Obama sat back. Now, the entire administration will be out front in support of ratifying it.

Hours after U.S. President Barack Obama was re-elected, the United States backed a U.N. committee's call on Wednesday to renew debate over a...

Wednesday, May 22 | 05:36 PM ET
Wednesday, May 22 | 05:36 PM ET
Wednesday, May 22 | 05:36 PM ET
Wednesday, May 22 | 05:36 PM ET