Previous 11 - 20 Next
Michael Brown was a thug and reaped the just consequences of his stupid, reckless, thoughtless, violent behavior. And all the burners, destroyers, and looters in Ferguson deserve the exact same consequences.
I have no problem with people protesting the decision, even if I think they're all a bunch of dumb and dumber idiots without 2 brain cells to rub together. On the other hand, the violent ones burning, destroying and looting just need to shot dead out of hand. Don't even try to arrest them. Ferguson, like too many other places in the world, needs cleansing of that element.
In response to:

Beware of Our Betters

Dr_Zinj Wrote: 20 hours ago (8:43 AM)
I think Dr Sowell is too smart to let himself be conned into the Presidency.
In response to:

Beware of Our Betters

Dr_Zinj Wrote: 20 hours ago (8:43 AM)
And the question is, what definition are we using for the word, "rape"? California law considers rape to be if the woman later regrets having sex (not much different than Sweden.)
In response to:

Beware of Our Betters

Dr_Zinj Wrote: 20 hours ago (8:40 AM)
Read "Ameritopia" by Mark Levin. Good book, even if it does make you retch over the state of the State.
In response to:

Beware of Our Betters

Dr_Zinj Wrote: 20 hours ago (8:38 AM)
Any time you hear the phrase, "A consensus of scientists agree..." I guarantee that what's being said is a total lie, was cherry-picked, or the speaker is ignorant. There are no exceptions.
In response to:

Beware of Our Betters

Dr_Zinj Wrote: 20 hours ago (8:36 AM)
Or we could get really snarky and say a watermelon could do a better job as President than BHO. Oh, but that would be considered a racist comment. And Bloomberg & Michelle will probably ban watermelons next as being bad for you.
What did Obama really do? He said he wasn't going to deport the illegal parents of anchor babies; and was going to allow them the benefits, if not actual, legal residency. In one respect, he committed an illegal act violating the separation of powers; usurping Congress's authority to determine citizenship and immigration laws. On the other hand, his action DOES protect the rights of minor American citizens. No government, much less our own, should have the power to deprive a child of his or her parents, or force that child to leave the country due to the crimes of the parent. This accords with Christian belief that it is better for a hundred criminals to escape punishment than to punish a single innocent person. The solution isn't to fight Obama or debate the rightness or wrongness of his actions. The solution is for Congress, both Democrate and Republican, to get off their deadbeat, hypocritcal, ineffectual, lying buttocks and amend the Constitution to change birthright citizenship to remove the capability of anchor babies. You do that by requiring at least one parent be a U.S. citizen at the time of the child's birth, no matter where in the world the child is born; or the birth mother be a legal resident at the time she delivers in the U.S.
In response to:

For Thanksgiving - Pass the Civility

Dr_Zinj Wrote: Nov 24, 2014 10:30 AM
Progressives rarely are ready for application of the Socratic process. Ask them why they feel that way. Ask them for examples. Don't make direct contradictory rebuttals to them. Instead, pose them as a question that they have to actually think about. Be warned, thinking is a painful process to progressives and they resist it at every turn.
In response to:

Obama Flips Blacks on Backs

Dr_Zinj Wrote: Nov 24, 2014 10:06 AM
Microsoft Word spelling and grammar checker isn't smart enough to distinguish the difference. And it IS easy to miss even if you proof read it several times.
In response to:

Obama Flips Blacks on Backs

Dr_Zinj Wrote: Nov 24, 2014 10:01 AM
Neither one of my kids can seem to get a starter job because too many people are applying for them, and too few are being offered due to excessively high minimum wage rates.
Previous 11 - 20 Next