Oh the way they cover this Pres. backside. Amazing. Because he said the word "terror" twice, in a completely different context, the guy from Politico says that makes it an arguable point. They must not be able to see where he NEVER puts Bengahzi and terrorist attack together until days after. If it wasn't for the MSM this race would be over. I don't know why O even needs to campaign when he has free campaign time thru the MSM!
HEMPSTEAD, NY - President Obama was noticeably sharper and more aggressive in tonight's debate, as both candidates exchanged barbs throughout the evening. Mitt Romney excelled by focusing on jobs, jobs, jobs, and repeatedly forcing voters to notice the canyon between Obama's rhetoric and his record. Romney's strongest answer came after Obama attempted to apply lipstick to his failed record in office. Romney unleashed a torrent of facts that pushed back forcefully against each and every one of those claims. It should be cut into an ad as soon as possible. Throughout the night, Romney was asked questions from the audience...
"As for the ones we lost last night: I want to assure you, we will bring their killers to justice. And we want to send a message all around the world -- anybody who would do us harm: No act of terror will dim the light of the values that we proudly shine on the rest of the world, and no act of violence will shake the resolve of the United States of America."
He begins the excerpt with, "As for the ones we lost last night." How is this not a reference to the Benghazi attacks as an act of terror--one that, like other acts of terror, would not shake our resolve. How is this confusing? The right's echo chamber is truly AMAZING--opinions supplant facts in the drive to construct your side's "reality."