In response to:

Shouting Louder

downtherabbithole Wrote: Jan 29, 2013 9:27 AM
"We had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest, or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided they'd go kill some Americans? What difference, at this point, does it make?" Well, Ms Clinton, let's analyze your logic and apply it to different situations and see how liberals might react: 1) "We had five men breaking into the the Democratic National Committee (DNC) headquarters at the Watergate complex on June 17, 1972. Were these political operatives, or was it just five robbers looking for something to steal? What difference does it make, Ms Clinton, hmmmm? Cont. below . . .
downtherabbithole Wrote: Jan 29, 2013 9:27 AM
2) "We had the removal of a madman in Iraq. Was it for weapons of mass destruction? Was it because he was a bellicose dictator who murdered (gassed) millions of his own citizens? Was it because he was a provocative destabilizing threat to peace in the region? At this point, please tell us what difference it makes Ms Clinton?

I doubt that liberals like Hillary are willing to swallow the same logic that they try to feed us. No, they will protest and choke on their own logic when being fed to them.

An old-time trial lawyer once said, "When your case is weak, shout louder!"

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton shouted louder when asked about the Obama administration's story last fall that the September 11th attack on the U.S. ambassador's quarters in Benghazi was due to an anti-Islamic video that someone in the United States had put on the Internet, and thereby provoked a protest that escalated into violence.

She shouted: "We had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided they'd go kill some Americans? What...