Previous 11 - 20 Next
Go spread your cr ap somewhere else! Obama CHOSE to attend and Dr. Carson was BRILLIANT!!
It’s not Dr. Carson’s fault that the President’s policies and preferences are at odds with their hosts’ beliefs and agenda – and what has brought them together since before there was a Dr. Carson or a President Obama. It’s no surprise the kind of speaker they’d invite for inspiration. The hosts, the prayer breakfast, the people, their religions and the teachings of their faith(s) come first. The President is the interloper.
This wasn’t a Presidential appearance with a bunch of church folk. This was a faith-based event which the President CHOSE to attend. At this prayer breakfast, Dr. Carson spoke about the large issues confronting the country from the perspective of a life grounded in achievement, responsibility and faith. His over-arching point is that these three things go together. The operative word is “prayer”, with “national” meaning geography not government, and scope of issues, again not government. Their faith and preferences are not dependent on which President is there or not. Their agenda is their own, as it has been all along, at the juncture of national issues and faith, as it has been all along. Cont. below. . . .
Good Lord! What a useless Secretary of State. I have tried to think of any accomplishment of hers during her stewardship of the State Department, but have yet to come up with one - unless resigning counts. Come to think of it I also can't recall any of her successes as First Lady or as Senator from New York. And to think that some (including her) actually think she is presidential material. What the he-ll is our country coming to?
I'm all for this SLS, sad to say that after researching, it looks like the following applies: The criminal penalty for fraudulently voting when not legally qualified or for voting more than once when qualified is a fine of $ 300 to $ 500, one to two years imprisonment, and disenfranchisement. Anyone who votes or attempts to vote by assuming the name of another is subject to a $ 500 fine, one year in prison, and disenfranchisement. CGS § 9-360. The penalty has been the same since at least 1877 (January 1877, Ch. 146, § 51).
Well, it looks like the Dems have successfully created a middle class that is dependent on the government and will continue to vote and vote and vote and vote for refilling the punch bowl.
Obama and his party will do whatever it takes to bring this nation down to its knees. The I Hate America Club voted for more change and the rest of us are going to pay a high price. Four years in and he has already begun to fundamentally change this nation. I'm no longer convinced that the legislative and judicial branches or anyone can stop them.
Awesome M30! I am so on board with this.
In response to:

Prophets and Losses: Part II

downtherabbithole Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 9:29 AM
Specious Rule commented below: Of course our majority run house just allowed a tax increase. Yep, and that tax increase will most likely go towards the new Obama smartphones (along with paid plans), to be issued free to the "unemployed" by the company (cozy with the Obama's) that was just awarded the contract to produce them.
In response to:

Prophets and Losses: Part II

downtherabbithole Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 6:33 AM
Hmm . . . Left hand: Is this LD serious? . . . . Right hand: Or is this sarcasm?
Since they failed to do their"JOB", they need to return their pay to us taxpayers. If I remember it was the taxpayers who subsidized their salaries.
Previous 11 - 20 Next