Now we have Benghazi and the IRS..where are the names? I ask, the names? Someone signed off on all these crimes or total ineptness or both. Where are the names? ====== As far as HRC, she is an arrogant apostle of utopian secular socialism...as such she MUST boldly lie/smear/demonize/promise to offset the naturally toxic results of moronic policies. She, as well as the OzBama, depend upon a pawn press that changes their dirty diapers daily. Well, not for 8 years...this is because the greatest enemies of these arrogant socialist control freaks are time and reality. Both trains are approaching town now. The gorilla of truth cannot be kept in the garbage can for 8 years...now the pawn press is in a tizzy because THEY put these socialists in power by comission and omission. They lost all credibility and will probably emerge from these multiple events as a joke. They deserve all the grief they get because they stopped being journalists, stopped trying to be objective and stopped protecting our nation by challenging the powerful.

Now we have Benghazi and the IRS..where are the names? I ask, the names? Someone signed off on all these crimes or total ineptness or both. Where are the names? ====== As far as HRC, she is an arrogant apostle of utopian secular socialism...as such she MUST boldly lie/smear/demonize/promise to offset the naturally toxic results of moronic policies. She, as well as the OzBama, depend upon a pawn press that changes their dirty diapers daily. Well, not for 8 years...this is because the greatest enemies of these arrogant socialist control freaks are time and reality. Both trains are approaching town now. The gorilla of truth cannot be kept in the garbage can for 8 years...now the pawn press is in a tizzy because THEY put these socialists in power by comission and omission. They lost all credibility and will probably emerge from these multiple events as a joke. They deserve all the grief they get because they stopped being journalists, stopped trying to be objective and stopped protecting our nation by challenging the powerful. (I am theconservativecrawfish)

Instead we have the fantasy and deception-based utopian secular socialist system being quickly implemented. Just ignore the present toxic results like most media. Who wants smaller more efficient gov-meant, lower taxes, less borrowing/printing billions and basic morality? Who? Now who wants, really wants monster control freak gov-meant/soaring taxes/massive printing-borrowing of $$$ and replacing faith with secularism? Those are the 2 main choices...of course the dimdems have clever ways of disguising their utopian secular socialism so millions of duped voters think its somehow superior. Buying votes is extremely expensive as socialist nations overseas discovered. Who has learned from history? What are schools teaching? ...

Liberals (aka the arrogant apostles of utopian socialism) use on 4 tactics worldwide...bold lies, distractions, smears and demons. They also have 2 areas of predictable ineptness/failure (for which they intensely use promises/bold lies/demons)...they cannot manage the economy of a hot dog stand much less a nation and they are thug trusting pansies in foreign policy. The liberal-dimdem socialists would rather simply nationalize everything to buy votes and run your life 24-7 while exempting themselves from the natural pain of their toxic socialist policies. Why is anyone surprised about OzBama? Why? His books, his parents and his past screamed "arrogant apostle of socialism" who would boldly promise, boldly lie and boldly smear daily.

They mean it...which is why 99% of them on TV-radio when asked relevant questions from the 7 things listed hem haw and mostly refuse to clearly answer...which IS their answer...like sermons inside and statements outside a mosque being very very different on the same topics!

Bold repeated lying has become the preferred tactic of many islamists and the arrogant apostles of utopian socialism like OzBama and his cadre of kooks. What is that ole saying? "Ignore what is said, watch what is done"...remember it daily. Oh, BTW, please post a list of the radical Baptist mass murders of innocents across the globe the past 40 years, then post the Methodist, then the Catholic, then the...well, you get the drift. Moslems are moslems first, not Americans, Canadians etc. The cultists who have inbred for 1,400 years mean it. The only research I ever saw on mosque "sermons" said 80% of the mosques were preaching very disturbing (aka hateful/intolerant) messages week after week. TBContinued once more

I had "Islam" in grad school history way back before PC-ism... it was promoted very early on with violence like beheading during the Hegira (7 year flight to Medina from Mecca) to intimidate caravans they encountered into affirming Allah, etc. Then, of course, they fought 7 wars against christian armies before Martel pushed them back at the Battle of Tours in France. Oh, its probably not in any high school world history course and some college texts anymore...part of the purging of truth so beloved by kooks. It seems also to be commonly known by those that care to check...that islam (aka the cult-of-allah) has a Quran that allows lying, even under oath, to "protect islam"... which can mean anything. TBContinued...

.....Here I go again...words matter....telling some writer not to use the word "progressive"...why do they insist on using only approved liberal-socialist terms? Why do they not realize the "low information" voter will slowly absorb that term and see it as a positive...and those against them as the negative? Use accurate terms like "regressive", "socialist left" or "utopian socialists"...even liberal but those using the new favorite term of the demo-socialists are again playing right into their hands....why do that?

Here I go again...words matter....telling some writer not to use the word "progressive"...why do they insist on using only approved liberal-socialist terms? Why do they not realize the "low information" voter will slowly absorb that term and see it as a positive...and those against them as the negative? Use accurate terms like "regressive", "socialist left" or "utopian socialists"...even liberal but those using the new favorite term of the demo-socialists are again playing right into their hands....why do that?

Please stop, just stop...never ever use the word "progressive" to describe the utopian secular socialists! Have we learned nothing yet about the "low info" voter who believes literally this term as positive!!! Just stop. Then, in a few months we will again here how "we are losing the word war"... well if you insist on defining the socialists only on the terms they prefer (which they NEVER do for conservatives)...there you go...duped again, controlled again, playing defense again...