In response to:

Without Deep Spending Cuts, the Republicans Lose the House in 2014

Doug4749 Wrote: Jan 19, 2013 8:39 PM
I agree and disagree with your post for all the reasons you cited. 'We have entered into an era of the most uniformed voters in history'. The second part of your post said, 'Once a solid Conservative party comes on board it will be lights out for the Democrats also!'. What makes you think it would be 'lights out'? Would the admittedly-dumb voters suddenly start paying attention to what's going on in the world? I doubt it. As long as they're getting all their perks, it doesn't make a bit of difference to them. It would be akin to biting the hand that feeds them to even CONSIDER voting for the better candidate.
Okay, it’s official. According to the Treasury Department, the U.S. debt jumped to $16.1 trillion in 2012 from $14.8 trillion in 2011. That’s a $1.3 trillion deficit for the last year. Remarkable. During President Obama’s first term, the federal debt rose by roughly $6 trillion.
Now, if they are bold, House Republicans will take advantage of these dismal numbers. Bold means bold spending cuts, as in cut spending like there’s no tomorrow. Bold means implementing the $1.2 trillion spending sequester. Bold means an absolute rock-solid commitment to spending cuts. A new Rasmussen survey shows that 62 percent of Americans favor across-the-board...
Related Tags: House Republicans