In response to:

A Solid Romney Win Where It Matters

doug3694 Wrote: Oct 23, 2012 12:35 AM
The military uses anything they need to use to win a battle. We have all seen the photos of the special forces guys riding horses in Afghanistan.
Tea Party in Wisconsin formerlyTea Party Wrote: Oct 23, 2012 12:45 AM
Thank you, I wasn't sure and was going by a post I'd read earlier on anothe site about the horses and my guess was also that they were used by the Spec Ops. And I asked if someone knew if I was correct and I scroll up after flagging the Troll and there you be.

When analyzing who won a debate, you can look at a number of factors: Who achieved their overarchhing objective, who had the most memorable lines, who might have left behind ticking time bombs in terms of statements that will return to haunt them.  Looking at any of the three, Romney was the clear winner, and Obama the loser.

Obviously, Romney's overarching objective wasn't to score debate points on Benghazi or Syria.  It was to prove that he is competent, calm, knowledgeable and -- most emphatically -- not a warmonger.  It was to make sure he seemed presidential.  He achieved it.  By...