In response to:

Obama’s Declaration of Collectivism

Doug3370 Wrote: Jan 26, 2013 11:32 AM
Market forces cannot determine the "most efficient and clean" energy sources unless the cost of "dirty" is born by those using the fuel. At present, it is not. Instead, when CO2 is released into the atmosphere, the general public eats the cost. The "most efficient" gasoline is leaded gasoline, if you don't count the cost to future generations of brain damage to children. And, absent non-market intervention, that cost was historically not counted. There must be some mechanism, such as a carbon tax, to ensure that the cost to future generations of the climate change that CO2 emissions drive is counted. It has to be part of the price of coal and oil. And then, we can see which fuel is in fact, and all things considered, most efficient.
traitorbill Wrote: Jan 26, 2013 1:23 PM
a 16 trillion dollar debt isn't a "cost to future generations?"

Global warming is a hoax to nudge naive people towards socialism. true science doesn't "hide the decline" and change the problem of global warming to climate change overnight. Science doesn't do that, political schemers do.

One of the least remarked upon aspects of President Obama’s inaugural speech was his attempt to co-opt the Founding Fathers’ Declaration of Independence to bolster his liberal-left agenda.

Sure, the president quoted one of the most important sentences in world history: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

So far, so good. But he later connected the Declaration with his own liberal agenda: “ . . . that fidelity to our founding principles...