In response to:

Good Girl with Gun Lives, Bad Guy with Knife Dies

Dot32 Wrote: Jan 02, 2013 11:03 PM
So true! My sister lives in a Chicago suburb and is a liberal (my parents didn't spank that one enough apparently). She and I got into a heated conversation about just this subject. I was mentioning Rahm Emmanuel's hatred of guns and his belief that law abiding citizens cannot be trusted with them, but HE is protected by armed guards. How is his protection somehow ok, but mine is not. She went off the deep end and yelled at me that Rahm speaks for 4 million people and he is a symbol of the city. I said--oh Hogwash. He is a public servant who is no better than I am, but he is worthy of armed protection, and I am not....interesting. She did not appreciate my comments. Oh well.

In my world, if a violent altercation occurs between two humans, the innocent assaulted party should live, and if anybody has to die or get critically wounded, it should be the sadistic perpetrator. Call me freaky.

To make certain this occurs, the innocent party has to be able to do one or two things when the crap hits the fan:

1. Open up a can of whup ass and immobilize the foul weed, thus sending him to the hospital.

2. Double-lung the loser with a hot dose of lead, thus sending him to hell.

Yes, the...

Related Tags: Guns Crime Self Defense