In response to:

As Blizzard Nemo Strikes, Global Warming Won’t Be Far Behind

Don't Tread On Me3 Wrote: Feb 09, 2013 5:41 PM
I guess we'll be hearing the "global warming caused the bad weather" meme from the usual suspects. Trouble is, it's contrary to the CO2 induced climate change theory. More CO2 does not make warm wet air warmer. To the extent it has any effect, it makes cold dry air warmer. Storms are heat engines, deriving their energy to move wind & water from heat moving from warm air to cold air. The power increases with the differences in temperature, & vice versa. If the cold air isn't as cold, heat moves more slowly, less energy is released, storms are less strong & frequent. More & stronger storms indicate, if anything, less effect from CO2, not more.
obmug Wrote: Feb 09, 2013 8:22 PM
2nd law of thermodynamics - seems to work every time. I wish I had the intuition and math skill to see how Gore and the Gurus' models and thermal entropy coexist.
Reginald10 Wrote: Feb 09, 2013 7:44 PM
Good point. They keep saying that the first effects of "global warming" will be to make the polar regions less cold. From your comment, I now see why that would be.

Blizzard Nemo is bearing down on the Northeast- hence the term nor’easter to describe it- so prepare for the folks at Fashion Week, now being held in New York City, to be out in force battling the storm.

“The organizers of New York's Fashion Week,” reports the CSMonitor,  “a closely watched series of fashion shows held under a big tent – said they will have extra crews to help with snow removal and will turn up the heat and add an extra layer to the venue.”

We can only hope that they wear furs.

Because we’ll need blizzards of hilarity...

Related Tags: Global Warming